Practice note: Copycat behavior by junior auditors – The impact of their senior’s working style and the role of promotion incentives
Cardinaels, Eddy Reusen, Evelien Goris, Jeffrey Stouthuysen, Kristof
Cardinaels, Eddy
Reusen, Evelien
Goris, Jeffrey
Stouthuysen, Kristof
Citations
Altmetric:
Publication Type
Editor
Supervisor
Publication Year
2020
Journal
Book
Publication Volume
Publication Issue
Publication Begin page
Publication End page
Publication NUmber of pages
8
Collections
Abstract
As a key attribute to audit quality, regulators specify that more experienced staff (i.e. managers, senior auditors) should provide less experienced staff with appropriate coaching and on-the-job training (IAASB 2014). It is fairly common for junior auditors to start their auditing career by mimicking a more senior person who performs similar tasks; as the saying goes, “Monkey see, monkey do” (Cannon, 2016). Yet, while imitation is an inherent human tendency, limited evidence exists on the impact of such imitative behavior on the quality of an individual auditor’s judgment. The objective of our research project is to examine the extent to which mimicking behavior occurs in junior–senior auditor relationships and its consequences for audit quality. In particular, we advance the argument that this imitation tendency may lead junior auditors to follow seniors’ auditing practices, even when those practices are not always ideal. We also examine whether promotion opportunities for the junior can be an important contributor in mimicking an audit style of a senior (which in turn would affect audit quality). The tendency to imitate their senior – even though his working practices might not be ideal - might be higher when the direct senior has a strong voice in the promotion decision of the junior. The findings of this study are expected to provide valuable insights and r recommendations for practice
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Keywords
Audit Quality, Imitation, Promotion