No Evidence for Loss Aversion Disappearance and Reversal in Walasek and Stewart (2015)
Quentin, André De Langhe, Bart
Quentin, André
De Langhe, Bart
Citations
Altmetric:
Publication Type
Journal article with impact factor
Editor
Supervisor
Publication Year
2021
Journal
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
Book
Publication Volume
150
Publication Issue
12
Publication Begin page
2659
Publication End page
2665
Publication Number of pages
Collections
Abstract
Loss aversion—the idea that losses loom larger than equivalent gains—is one of the most important ideas in Behavioral Economics. In an influential article published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Walasek and Stewart (2015) test an implication of decision by sampling theory: Loss aversion can disappear, and even reverse, depending on the distribution of gains and losses people have encountered. In this article, we show that the pattern of results reported in Walasek and Stewart (2015) should not be taken as evidence that loss aversion can disappear and reverse, or that decision by sampling is the origin of loss aversion. It emerges because the estimates of loss aversion are computed on different lotteries in different conditions. In other words, the experimental paradigm violates measurement invariance, and is invalid. We show that analyzing only the subset of lotteries that are common across conditions eliminates the pattern of results. We note that other recently published articles use similar experimental designs, and we discuss general implications for empirical examinations of utility functions.
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Keywords
Loss Aversion