The relative importance of environmental aspects vs. social aspects in defining sustainability vs. driving consumer boycott behavior
Schacht, Ole Weijters, Bert Deltomme, Berre Goedertier, Frank Van den Bergh, Joeri
Schacht, Ole
Weijters, Bert
Deltomme, Berre
Goedertier, Frank
Van den Bergh, Joeri
Citations
Altmetric:
Publication Type
Conference Proceeding
Editor
Supervisor
Publication Year
2022
Journal
Book
EMAC Annual Conference 2022, Proceedings
Publication Volume
Publication Issue
Publication Begin page
Publication End page
Publication Number of pages
Collections
Abstract
Companies increasingly include sustainability claims in their marketing and communication towards customers. Often firms assume that these customers have a non-ambiguous understanding of sustainability and suppose that the environmental dimension is the dominant consumer association. Using CFA applied to cross-national data from 7 countries, we find that consumers meaningfully distinguish social and environmental aspects when defining sustainability. Our results show that the environmental dimension is key but that the importance gap between both dimensions declines when consumers identify reasons to boycott brands. As consumer boycotts are an increasingly trending phenomenon, we show that social sustainability facets are important drivers of consumer boycotts. Based on our results, we conclude that firms that set sustainability priorities based on how they think consumers define sustainability might misfire, as social aspects might be underestimated as key drivers of boycott behavior.
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Keywords
Sustainability, Consumer Boycott, Structural Equation Modeling