Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVereecke, Ann
dc.contributor.authorPandelaere, Els
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-02T14:17:15Z
dc.date.available2017-12-02T14:17:15Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12127/1521
dc.description.abstractSince the introduction of the concepts of lean manufacturing, agility and mass customization it is questioned to what extent the trade-off between cost and flexibility still holds. It has been the objective of our research to test the trade-off theory empirically using the data of the International Manufacturing Strategy Survey (IMSS). Our research confirms the well accepted manufacturing profile of low cost producers, which typically use a line process, and of flexible producers, which typically produce in a job shop. However, we also observe that some companies manage to overcome the cost/flexibility trade-off, by introducing the concept of postponed manufacturing. These companies are characterized by an assembly-to-order policy of standardized semi-finished products, produced in a line process. Flexibility and low cost are thus obtained by playing with the position of the decoupling point. Keywords: manufacturing strategy, mass customization, flexibility
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherVlerick Business School
dc.subjectManufacturing
dc.titleThe manufacturing profile of flexible and low-cost producers: an empirical study
refterms.dateFOA2019-10-14T12:44:42Z
dc.source.issue21
dc.source.numberofpages24
vlerick.knowledgedomainOperations & Supply Chain Management
vlerick.supervisor
vlerick.typecommWorking paper
vlerick.vlerickdepartmentTOM
dc.relation.urlhttp://public.vlerick.com/Publications/91fe9fc3-69a9-e011-8a89-005056a635ed.pdf
dc.identifier.vperid49674
dc.identifier.vperid35922
dc.identifier.vpubid1657


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Vereecke_A_WP_ManufacturingPro ...
Size:
106.3Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record