The manufacturing profile of flexible and low-cost producers: an empirical study
dc.contributor.author | Vereecke, Ann | |
dc.contributor.author | Pandelaere, Els | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-12-02T14:17:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-12-02T14:17:15Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2004 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12127/1521 | |
dc.description.abstract | Since the introduction of the concepts of lean manufacturing, agility and mass customization it is questioned to what extent the trade-off between cost and flexibility still holds. It has been the objective of our research to test the trade-off theory empirically using the data of the International Manufacturing Strategy Survey (IMSS). Our research confirms the well accepted manufacturing profile of low cost producers, which typically use a line process, and of flexible producers, which typically produce in a job shop. However, we also observe that some companies manage to overcome the cost/flexibility trade-off, by introducing the concept of postponed manufacturing. These companies are characterized by an assembly-to-order policy of standardized semi-finished products, produced in a line process. Flexibility and low cost are thus obtained by playing with the position of the decoupling point. Keywords: manufacturing strategy, mass customization, flexibility | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Vlerick Business School | |
dc.subject | Manufacturing | |
dc.title | The manufacturing profile of flexible and low-cost producers: an empirical study | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2019-10-14T12:44:42Z | |
dc.source.issue | 21 | |
dc.source.numberofpages | 24 | |
vlerick.knowledgedomain | Operations & Supply Chain Management | |
vlerick.supervisor | ||
vlerick.typecomm | Working paper | |
vlerick.vlerickdepartment | TOM | |
dc.relation.url | http://public.vlerick.com/Publications/91fe9fc3-69a9-e011-8a89-005056a635ed.pdf | |
dc.identifier.vperid | 49674 | |
dc.identifier.vperid | 35922 | |
dc.identifier.vpubid | 1657 |