Publication typeJournal article
AuthorVan Steerthem, Angie
Publication Begin page54
Publication End page56
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractSince 2008, Risk-Reward Views have been the basis for the recommendations on all the stocks covered by Morgan Stanley's equity research analysts globally. The firm's analysts use this systematic approach to communicate a broader range of fundamental insights about expected returns and risks, and to articulate more clearly the logic underlying their price targets and calls, and the level of conviction associated with them. The rationale for this approach is to align the firm's research product with its clients' thinking and investment discipline while also creating a link between traditional equity analysis and widely accepted principles of modern portfolio management. Too many sell-side analysts still try to manifest expertise and conviction with one-sided investment theses backed by single-point estimates and “table pounding.” That does a disservice to investors who are looking to sell-side analysts for an ongoing dialogue about the future with experts on company fundamentals. Risk-Reward Views are designed to produce a more complete view of the risk-reward trade-off in a given stock. They are meant to supplement the use of quant-only risk models that, while offering at least the illusion of precision, are also often opaque and backward looking. The approach aims to increase transparency while avoiding unnecessary complexity by focusing on a handful of critical uncertainties and modeling a manageable number of coherent scenarios that are relevant to investor debates and cover a full range of plausible outcomes. This article focuses on the theoretical underpinnings of the department's Risk-Reward initiative. For a more detailed discussion of the institutional setting and the processes followed to implement these ideas, readers are referred to the recently published Harvard Business School case study, “The Risk-Reward Framework at Morgan Stanley Research” (Harvard Business School Case N9–111–011).
Knowledge Domain/IndustryPeople Management & Leadership
Human Resource Management