• Login
    View Item 
    •   Vlerick Repository Home
    • Vlerick Research Output
    • Articles
    • View Item
    •   Vlerick Repository Home
    • Vlerick Research Output
    • Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of Vlerick RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsKnowledge Domain/IndustryThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsKnowledge Domain/Industry

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Contact & Info

    ContactVlerick Journal ListOpen AccessVlerick Business School

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Exploring the impact of cognitive style profiles on different learning approaches: Empirical evidence for adopting a person-centered perspective

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Publisher version
    View Source
    Access full-text PDFOpen Access
    View Source
    Check access options
    Check access options
    Publication type
    Journal article with impact factor
    Author
    Bouckenooghe, Dave
    Cools, Eva
    De Clercq, Dirk
    Vanderheyden, Karlien
    Fatima, T.
    Publication Year
    2016
    Journal
    Learning and Individual Differences
    Publication Volume
    51
    Publication Begin page
    299
    Publication End page
    306
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This study aims to clarify whether and how various configurations of three cognitive style dimensions (creating, knowing, and planning) emerge among graduate business students, with differential impacts on their learning approaches. With a person-centered, latent transition analysis of cognitive styles, the authors identify several distinct cognitive style profiles: a moderate cognitive style profile, a dominant creating and knowing style profile, a dominant creating and low planning style profile, and a dominant planning and low creating style profile. The analysis also offers evidence of the trait-like character of these cognitive style profiles, by demonstrating their temporal stability. Furthermore, significant differences arise across profiles in terms of how they relate to different learning approaches (strategic, deep, and surface learning).
    Keyword
    Cognitive Styles, Latent Transition Analysis, Learning Approaches, Individual Differences
    Knowledge Domain/Industry
    People Management & Leadership
    DOI
    10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.043
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12127/5619
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.043
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Articles

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.