Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorErden, Zeynep
dc.contributor.authorvon Krogh, Georg
dc.contributor.authorNytorp, Cecilia
dc.contributor.authorHultberg, Marcus
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-13T09:25:31Z
dc.date.available2018-04-13T09:25:31Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.issn1359-6446
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.drudis.2009.04.004
dc.identifier.pmid19416760
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12127/5948
dc.description.abstractThe biopharmaceutical industry is characterized by intense competition, high uncertainty, and strong dependence on scientific knowledge. We show that in order to succeed in this industry, firms need to be positioned along three strategic dimensions: the level of inter-firm R&D partnering, the level of diversification, and the size of the firm. Prior research has revealed that a firm's membership in so-called ‘strategic groups’ impacts strongly on its performance. This study analyzes strategic groups in the biopharmaceutical industry along the strategic dimensions listed. The performance of the groups differs significantly. The best performing groups are the ones that consist of large firms with a high level of in-house diversification across therapeutic areas and the medium-sized firms that pursue partnership with other companies.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.titleStrategic groups in the biopharmaceutical industry: Implications for performance
dc.identifier.journalDrug Discovery Today
dc.source.volume14
dc.source.issue15-16
dc.source.beginpage726
dc.source.endpage730
dc.contributor.departmentETH Zurich
vlerick.knowledgedomainEntrepreneurship
vlerick.knowledgedomainSpecial Industries : Healthcare Management
vlerick.knowledgedomainStrategy
vlerick.typearticleJournal article with impact factor
dc.identifier.vperid237517


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record