• Login
    View Item 
    •   Vlerick Repository Home
    • Research Output
    • Articles
    • View Item
    •   Vlerick Repository Home
    • Research Output
    • Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of Vlerick RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsKnowledge Domain/IndustryThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsKnowledge Domain/Industry

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Contact & Info

    ContactVlerick Journal ListOpen AccessVlerick Business School

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Evaluation of precision medicine assessment reports of the Belgian healthcare payer to inform reimbursement decisions

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Publication type
    Journal article with impact factor
    Author
    Govaerts, Laurenz
    Waeytens, Anouk
    Van Dyck, Walter
    Simoens, Steven
    Huys, Isabelle
    Publication Year
    2020
    Journal
    International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
    Publication Volume
    36
    Publication Issue
    4
    Publication Begin page
    410
    Publication End page
    417
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Introduction. Precision medicines rely on companion diagnostics to identify patient subgroups eligible for receiving the pharmaceutical product. Until recently, the Belgian public health payer, RIZIV-INAMI, assessed precision medicines and companion diagnostics separately for reimbursement decisions. As both components are considered co-dependent technologies, their assessment should be conducted jointly from a health technology assessment (HTA) perspective. As of July 2019, a novel procedure was implemented accommodating for this joint assessment practice. The aim of this research was to formulate recommendations to improve the assessment in the novel procedure. Methods. This study evaluated the precision medicine assessment reports of RIZIV-INAMI of the last 5 years under the former assessment procedure. The HTA framework for co-dependent technologies developed by Merlin et al. for the Australian healthcare system was used as a reference standard in this evaluation. Criteria were scored as either present or not present. Results. Thirteen assessment reports were evaluated. Varying scores between reports were obtained for the domain establishing the co-dependent relationship between diagnostic and pharmaceutical. Domains evaluating the clinical utility of the biomarker and the cost-effectiveness performed poorly, whereas the budget impact and the transfer of trial data to the local setting performed well. Recommendations. Based on these results we recommend three amendments for the novel procedure. (i) The implementation of the linked evidence approach when direct evidence of clinical utility is not present, (ii) incorporation of a bias assessment tool, and (iii) further specify guidelines for submission and assessment to decrease the variability of reported evidence between assessment reports.
    Keyword
    Precision Medicine, Companion Diagnostics, Reimbursement
    Knowledge Domain/Industry
    Operations & Supply Chain Management
    Special Industries : Healthcare Management
    DOI
    10.1017/S0266462320000604
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12127/6576
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1017/S0266462320000604
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Articles

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.