Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBaeten, Xavier
dc.contributor.authorDe Ruyck, Bettina
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-18T11:47:54Z
dc.date.available2020-11-18T11:47:54Z
dc.date.issued2020en_US
dc.identifier.issn2690-6082
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12127/6587
dc.description.abstractThroughout this article, it became clear that there is no “European way” of executive compensation as a number of geographical differences were found to be present. However, the research shows that the variance is explained by determinants such as business size, the industry in which the company operates and the share ownership structure. The article also looked at the underlying key performance indicators used for incentive systems. Not surprisingly, financial indicators were found to be most prevalent, determining on average 70% of the bonus while company size was the main driver of CEO compensation. We found that CEO compensation policies in the best performing companies, over a longer period of time, are characterized by modesty. This applies to compensation levels, the weight of incentives in the total package, and the spread between target and maximum bonus.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWorldatworken_US
dc.subjectRewardsen_US
dc.subjectExecutive Compensationen_US
dc.titlePertinent insights from Europe on executive compensationen_US
dc.identifier.journalThe Journal of Total Rewardsen_US
dc.source.issueQ4en_US
dc.source.beginpage62en_US
dc.source.endpage74en_US
vlerick.knowledgedomainEntrepreneurshipen_US
vlerick.typearticleJournal articleen_US
vlerick.vlerickdepartmentEGSen_US
vlerick.vlerickdepartmentCFESRen_US
dc.identifier.vperid35832en_US
dc.identifier.vperid248102en_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record