• Login
    View Item 
    •   Vlerick Repository Home
    • Research Output
    • Conference Presentations
    • View Item
    •   Vlerick Repository Home
    • Research Output
    • Conference Presentations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of Vlerick RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsKnowledge Domain/IndustryThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsKnowledge Domain/Industry

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Contact & Info

    ContactVlerick Journal ListOpen AccessVlerick Business School

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Antecedents and consequences of collective psychological ownership

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Publication type
    Conference Proceeding
    Author
    Giordano, Ana, Paula
    Patient, David
    Passos, Anna Margarida
    Sguera, Francesco
    Publication Year
    2016
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The popular and business press has long hailed employee’s “owning” their projects as a key to motivation (e.g., Bullock, 2014), but only in the last twenty years has the phenomenon been more rigorously examined by organizational scholars. Although such work has tended to study ownership feelings at the individual level, recent conceptual work has begun to investigate the importance of feelings of “us” and “ours” with respect to teams and their work output. In their seminal work, Pierce and Jussila (2010) defined Collective Psychological Ownership as a feeling of collective possessiveness and attachment to organizational objects, that can be measured at the individual or group level. In this research, we use several methodologies and three different samples to test the conceptual structure and construct validity of three drivers of CPO proposed by Pierce and Jussila (2010): the extent that the team members have all invested, controlled, and come to know intimately a specific team work product. Results support a three-factor structure (Study 1). Additionally, CPO mediates the relationship between investment, intimate knowledge and positive team outcomes, such as perceptions of effectiveness regarding the team and quit intentions, as well as championing intentions regarding the shared work product (Study 2).
    Keyword
    Collective Psychological Ownership, Teams
    Knowledge Domain/Industry
    People Management & Leadership
    DOI
    10.5465/ambpp.2016.130
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12127/6499
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.5465/ambpp.2016.130
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Conference Presentations

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.