Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Publication

The reputational effects of analysts' stock recommendations and credit ratings: Evidence from operational risk announcements in the financial industry

Barakat, Ahmed
Ashby, Simon
Fenn, Paul
Citations
Altmetric:
Publication Type
Journal article with impact factor
Editor
Supervisor
Publication Year
2018
Journal
International Review of Financial Analysis
Book
Publication Volume
55
Publication Issue
1
Publication Begin page
1
Publication End page
22
Publication NUmber of pages
Collections
Abstract
This paper investigates whether more favorable stock recommendations and higher credit ratings serve as a reputational asset or reputational liability around reputation-damaging events. Analyzing the reputational effects of operational risk announcements incurred by financial institutions, we find that firms with a “Buy” stock recommendation or “Speculative Grade” credit rating are more likely to incur an equity-based reputational damage. In addition, firms with lower credit ratings incur a much more severe debt-based reputational damage. Moreover, credit ratings are more instrumental in mitigating the debt-based reputational damage caused by fraud incidents or incurred in non-banking activities. Furthermore, the misconduct of senior management could demolish the reputation of firms with less heterogeneous stock recommendations. Finally, credit ratings serve as an equity-based reputational asset in the short term but turn into an equity-based reputational liability in the long term. Overall, our analysis reveals that stock recommendations represent a reputational burden and credit ratings act as a reputational shield; however, the persistence and magnitude of such reputational effects are moderated by time and event characteristics.
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Keywords
Reputational Risk, Operational Risk, Financial Analysts, Stock Recommendations, Credit Ratings, Financial Institutions
Citation
Other links
Embedded videos