• Login
    View Item 
    •   Vlerick Repository Home
    • Research Output
    • Articles
    • View Item
    •   Vlerick Repository Home
    • Research Output
    • Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of Vlerick RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsKnowledge Domain/IndustryThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsKnowledge Domain/Industry

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Contact & Info

    ContactVlerick Journal ListOpen AccessVlerick Business School

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Exploring social preferences in private-collection innovation

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Publication type
    Journal article with impact factor
    Author
    Garriga, Helena
    Aksuyek, Efe
    Hacklin, Fredrik
    von Krogh, Georg
    Publication Year
    2012
    Journal
    Technology Analysis & Strategic Management
    Publication Volume
    24
    Publication Issue
    2
    Publication Begin page
    113
    Publication End page
    127
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Firms, research institutions and individuals have long realised the advantages of innovating in an open manner. Companies such as IBM, Philips and Procter & Gamble, increasingly seek to cooperate with outside individuals and organisations to tap into their ideas for new products and services. This approach makes good business sense, but it is also difficult to achieve. In particular, mechanisms that motivate innovators to ‘open up’ are critical in achieving the benefits of open innovation. Private–collective innovation (PCI) has become an increasingly important model for explaining innovation at the boundaries of traditional, closed and open innovation regimes. Previous work has examined PCI both conceptually and empirically, and recent scholarship has focused specifically on the initiation of PCI as it relates to problems of collective action. This work shows that a project will not ‘take off’ unless the right incentives are in place for innovators to contribute their knowledge to open innovation from the beginning. Drawing on behavioural game theory, this paper expands on prior work by exploring social preferences in the initiation of PCI. The authors conducted a simulation study that shows how inequality aversion, reciprocity and fairness affect the underlying conditions that lead to the initiation of PCI. The results indicate that reciprocity and the potential gains for other participants explain changes in individual knowledge sharing in PCI.
    Keyword
    Knowledge-sharing, Game Theory, Private Collective Innovation
    Knowledge Domain/Industry
    Entrepreneurship
    DOI
    10.1080/09537325.2012.647638
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12127/5800
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1080/09537325.2012.647638
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Articles

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.